Isaac Lhomond vs Yannis Batsabaken Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• When it comes to second serve success in the past six months, Lhomond has a slight edge, securing 37.18% of points, compared to Batsabaken's 33.33%.
• How do they fare in return games? Lhomond has taken 47.52% of opponents' second serve points, just shy of Batsabaken's 47.73%, but lags behind Batsabaken's impressive 41.57% on first serve returns, with only 29.3%.
• Lhomond shows resilience under pressure, saving 49.15% of breakpoints, whereas Batsabaken manages to save 42.86%.
• Analyzing overall performance over the past year, Lhomond leads, winning 60% of their matches, while Batsabaken has secured victory in just 33.33%.
• Who performs better on different surfaces? Lhomond excels on clay, winning 60% of their matches, while Batsabaken's best surface is indoor hard, albeit with only a 25% win rate.
• Both players mostly compete at the $10K level in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, but Lhomond boasts a 60% win rate compared to Batsabaken's 33.33%.
• Over the last 12 months, Lhomond has faced stronger opponents, with an average rank of 235.5, whereas Batsabaken's opponent data is missing, indicating lesser exposure to ranked players.
• If the match heads into a deciding set, Batsabaken might have an edge, winning 50% of such sets, while Lhomond has not won any in the last year.
• In recent form, Batsabaken converts a higher percentage of breakpoint opportunities at 58.33%, a commanding lead over Lhomond's 30% conversion rate.

Editorial Prediction (September 15, 2025, UTC):

As we compare both players' recent performances and statistics, certain patterns emerge that can guide our prediction for this upcoming match.

Lhomond has demonstrated marginally better performance on both second serves and in handling pressure, saving a greater percentage of breakpoints. Their overall match win percentage is notably higher, indicating consistency at the tournament level they compete in.

However, Batsabaken shows better return stats on first serve points and a superior breakpoint conversion rate, crucial elements that can significantly impact match outcomes. Additionally, if the contest extends to a deciding set, Batsabaken appears more adept at managing such high-pressure situations.

Considering these factors, Lhomond's slightly superior overall performance and experience against higher-ranked opponents suggest they may have the advantage. Nonetheless, Batsabaken's ability to convert key points should not be underestimated. Given all these elements, Lhomond is most likely to win this tennis match.